A2 track design

danman
Profile picture for user danman
Posts
1205
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Readstown, WI US
danman
Edited Date/Time 1/21/2012 7:30pm
What did everyone think?
I thought the layout sucked balls! Definitely didn't make for easy passing. Looked more like an Arenacross event.
|
todder
Profile picture for user todder
Posts
1608
Joined
10/20/2006
Location
Sw, WI US
todder 1/18/2009 6:26pm
1/18/2009 6:26pm
By far the worst SX track I've ever seen.
mx42
Profile picture for user mx42
Posts
16
Joined
1/12/2009
Location
Hastings, MN US
mx42 1/18/2009 6:35pm
1/18/2009 6:35pm
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/anaheim3…
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/sandiego…
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/atlanta.h…
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/indy.html
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/stlouis.h…
http://www.supercrossonline.com/images/track_and_seating/2009/toronto.h…
maguire
Profile picture for user maguire
Posts
63
Joined
1/2/2009
Location
Toms River, NJ US
maguire 1/18/2009 6:35pm
1/18/2009 6:35pm
todder wrote:
By far the worst SX track I've ever seen.
x2

The Shop

See All »
Tbteam
Profile picture for user Tbteam
Posts
2799
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ormond Beach, FL US
Tbteam 1/18/2009 6:55pm
1/18/2009 6:55pm
At least it wasn't the same damn cookie cutter, bullshit that we have had to endure for the majority of the last 5 years.

Start, 180, timing section, 60 foot triple, whoop section, step up, repeat. Just mix it up each weekend and have a race. the riders don't even have to ride practice. Just hit the jump in third, etc.
Tiki
Profile picture for user Tiki
Posts
10338
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA US
Fantasy
1695th
Tiki 1/18/2009 6:58pm
1/18/2009 6:58pm
I liked it. Looking forward to more of the different tracks.
Racer92
Profile picture for user Racer92
Posts
17967
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX US
Racer92 1/18/2009 6:59pm
1/18/2009 6:59pm
Tbteam wrote:
At least it wasn't the same damn cookie cutter, bullshit that we have had to endure for the majority of the last 5 years. Start, 180...
At least it wasn't the same damn cookie cutter, bullshit that we have had to endure for the majority of the last 5 years.

Start, 180, timing section, 60 foot triple, whoop section, step up, repeat. Just mix it up each weekend and have a race. the riders don't even have to ride practice. Just hit the jump in third, etc.
OW38B
Profile picture for user OW38B
Posts
3224
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Coto de Caza, CA US
Fantasy
203rd
OW38B 1/18/2009 7:40pm
1/18/2009 7:40pm
danman wrote:
What did everyone think?
I thought the layout sucked balls! Definitely didn't make for easy passing. Looked more like an Arenacross event.
No Passing......Didn't Reed go from last to second?
Slow ~ Pro
Profile picture for user Slow ~ Pro
Posts
3834
Joined
3/27/2008
Location
Capistrano Beach, CA US
Slow ~ Pro 1/18/2009 7:46pm
1/18/2009 7:46pm
OW38B wrote:
No Passing......Didn't Reed go from last to second?
Correct, no passing unless you are going fast enough to make a pass.

Reed, passed 18 riders...19th to 2nd
Adam43
Profile picture for user Adam43
Posts
3185
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
WF
Adam43 1/18/2009 10:39pm
1/18/2009 10:39pm
Overall the track was great, a nice change.

I love it when they mix it up. I'm sick of the same cookie cutter layouts of the past decade.

Something things could have been different, but it was so unique that it was cool to watch even if the race was a runaway.

Post a reply to: A2 track design