A disgrace to supercross

Edited Date/Time 10/9/2016 8:06am
After watching the racing last I thought the event was a total sham and it showed in the attendance.
The track was very poor just a indoor sand track,no proper rythem,no whoops and the wrong dirt. I've seen better rthyem sections on mxgp tracks. Let's hope ys wakes up to the fact that they have lost so much money and sort it out if they do it again. Not impressed!
|
kongols
Posts
23997
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
10/9/2016 1:13am
[size=50][color=red]It wasn`t supercross. [/color][/size]


Never meant to be supercross.
jamma10
Posts
10576
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
10/9/2016 1:15am Edited Date/Time 10/9/2016 1:18am
Super 'Motocross' Cup. It was never advertised as Supercross.

It was always going to be a damp squib, but at the same time I guess you have to start somewhere.

Edit: I'm not convinced they should even be trying to start!
kongols
Posts
23997
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
10/9/2016 1:20am
Racing was good, I enjoyed it. Camera work was terrible.
cali11
Posts
1547
Joined
2/28/2016
Location
Federal Way, WA US
10/9/2016 1:45am
kongols wrote:
[size=50][color=red]It wasn`t supercross. [/color][/size]


Never meant to be supercross.
Cause the Euros can't ride SX?

The Shop

kongols
Posts
23997
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
10/9/2016 1:49am Edited Date/Time 10/9/2016 1:51am
cali11 wrote:
Cause the Euros can't ride SX?
No, because [size=50][color=red]it wasn`t supposed to be supercross. [/color][/size] It`s a riders and manufacturers cup that was held in a stadium.
51xc
Posts
2190
Joined
7/27/2015
Location
DE
10/9/2016 1:53am
and supercross is a disgrace to motocross.
kongols
Posts
23997
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
10/9/2016 1:55am
51xc wrote:
and supercross is a disgrace to motocross.
I disagree. Apples and oranges.
Crush
Posts
20962
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
10/9/2016 1:58am
Track seemed like a semi-sandy, small arenacross with no whoops and longer lap times...

And Gasjer seemed to have every crash I expected him to have this year in one night.
Crush
Posts
20962
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
10/9/2016 2:00am
Also, I definitely think 3 starts in a night adds some interest. Herlings had a bad, good and ok start, and it changed everything each time.
51xc
Posts
2190
Joined
7/27/2015
Location
DE
10/9/2016 2:02am
51xc wrote:
and supercross is a disgrace to motocross.
kongols wrote:
I disagree. Apples and oranges.
not if one takes away from the other.
crusty_xx
Posts
8550
Joined
6/8/2013
Location
CH
Fantasy
156th
10/9/2016 5:04am Edited Date/Time 10/9/2016 5:04am
After watching the racing last I thought the event was a total sham and it showed in the attendance. The track was very poor just a...
After watching the racing last I thought the event was a total sham and it showed in the attendance.
The track was very poor just a indoor sand track,no proper rythem,no whoops and the wrong dirt. I've seen better rthyem sections on mxgp tracks. Let's hope ys wakes up to the fact that they have lost so much money and sort it out if they do it again. Not impressed!
Man Anaheim sucks, no elevation change, no huge table tops, no high speed straights or downhills, completely man made track
Not impressed
tobz
Posts
3900
Joined
3/5/2007
Location
Adelaide AU
10/9/2016 5:14am
Spoilt for choice eh?
downard254
Posts
4055
Joined
12/10/2012
Location
Bremen, OH US
10/9/2016 5:20am
kongols wrote:
[size=50][color=red]It wasn`t supercross. [/color][/size]


Never meant to be supercross.
X2, it's like some folks just can't get it into their head that it was NEVER supposed to be supercross.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
hillbilly
Posts
9080
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Afton, TN US
10/9/2016 5:53am
kongols wrote:
[size=50][color=red]It wasn`t supercross. [/color][/size]


Never meant to be supercross.
If Jim Jones was alive you'd be in Guyana.
ATKpilot99
Posts
9820
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI US
10/9/2016 5:59am
The 1978 Houston SX called....they want their track back.
bvm111
Posts
9329
Joined
7/1/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV US
10/9/2016 6:02am
cali11 wrote:
Cause the Euros can't ride SX?
kongols wrote:
No, because [size=50][color=red]it wasn`t supposed to be supercross. [/color][/size] It`s a riders and manufacturers cup that was held in a stadium.
So wait.... are you trying to say that this really wasn't a Supercross???
early
Posts
8284
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
Fantasy
2231st
10/9/2016 6:03am
kongols wrote:
[size=50][color=red]It wasn`t supercross. [/color][/size]


Never meant to be supercross.
hillbilly wrote:
If Jim Jones was alive you'd be in Guyana.
Thats why he typed it in the color of kool-aid.

I paid for it so i helped YS recover some of the money they lost in attendance. I dont get the obsession with sand races it might be fun to ride in but piling a bunch of sand where it shouldnt be just isnt interesting to me, its like lazy track design. Anyway not as good as i was hoping, but the MEC usually ist either.
mx836
Posts
5579
Joined
4/2/2008
Location
; BF
10/9/2016 6:08am
I'm glad I saved my money on the live stream. Not impressed. Did anybody mention that the track looked nothing like Supercross?
Paul333
Posts
1840
Joined
2/15/2012
Location
Virginia Beach, VA US
10/9/2016 6:21am Edited Date/Time 10/9/2016 6:24am
The only reason Youthstream didn't call it a "Supercross" is because Field Entertainment in the U.S. owns the name. Hence we got "Super Motocross".

That the track was so poor, in my opinion equal to a fair ground track is merely a coincidence.

The track didn't have a U.S. Supercross equivalent Whoop section because Youthstream wanted their GP riders to be competitive. Plus none of the off season Supercross races have real Whoop sections either. Not even the Monster Cup.
a22
Posts
866
Joined
7/21/2011
Location
London GB
10/9/2016 6:44am
Wasn't quite sure what to make of it really.... don't know if it was me just thinking it but was the track abit sketchy/ dangerous looking even? Gajser and Dunge nearly flipped right over the front I noticed and the dirt looked kind of very soft and pulled you in different directions from where you intended possibly. Herlings also was getting really chucked about in places.
May have just been me imagining it, but it sort of looked like a few riders were having some quite close calls out there, more than other tracks possibly?
jj welks
Posts
712
Joined
5/14/2015
Location
NH US
10/9/2016 7:07am
"Wrong dirt"... Good lord, I didn't know there was a specific type of dirt dirtbikers have to ride on educate me more plz
BAMX
Posts
2841
Joined
1/22/2012
Location
Fallbrook, CA US
10/9/2016 7:10am
Honest question for those in Europe: Would you have been more likely to attend the SMX Cup if it were a proper Supercross event? By that, I mean track, format, riders.
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4507
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX US
10/9/2016 7:12am
That track kicked ass! Probably the closest thing we'll ever see of modern pros racing on a 80's style vintage track.
10/9/2016 7:46am
Track was great. If it'd been hard pack then it would've been boring and needed something extra imo, but come the actual race and I warmed to it significantly. Obviously no substitute for the real deal but OK for a fun event. Racing was also great. Only thing that stunk was the attendance.
urbanlift707
Posts
892
Joined
9/27/2006
Location
Humboldt, CA US
10/9/2016 8:10am
I haven't seen it yet, and don't care if it was or wasn't, I like dirt bike racing no matter the surface or discipline. But I thought it was supposed to be supercross, just watching all the post from the euro riders they were all riding supercross tracks getting ready. Even before those post I guess I just thought it was going to be a sx race. Perhaps others did as well and that's why they are butt hurt.
jamma10
Posts
10576
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
10/9/2016 9:12am
Paul333 wrote:
The only reason Youthstream didn't call it a "Supercross" is because Field Entertainment in the U.S. owns the name. Hence we got "Super Motocross". That the...
The only reason Youthstream didn't call it a "Supercross" is because Field Entertainment in the U.S. owns the name. Hence we got "Super Motocross".

That the track was so poor, in my opinion equal to a fair ground track is merely a coincidence.

The track didn't have a U.S. Supercross equivalent Whoop section because Youthstream wanted their GP riders to be competitive. Plus none of the off season Supercross races have real Whoop sections either. Not even the Monster Cup.
You don't seem to have a clue what you're talking about.
MotoX85
Posts
2199
Joined
10/9/2011
Location
Centralia, IL US
10/31/2016 10:33am Edited Date/Time 10/31/2016 10:34am
Ive got to add to this since nobody on hear knows a damn thing about motorcycle racing.

The word SUPERCROSS was coined because they were bringing motocross into a stadium. They needed a new word and supercross was it.

So now you are telling me that there is an event in Germany that is brining motocross into a stadium and it is NOT suprecross.

I know they cannot use the word supercross because it is now patented so they used the words super motocross, which we all know what they were trying to say.

When the race arrives, after everyone is expecting a SUPERCROSS race, and the track is a total joke and rigged so if any Americans show up they wont blow the international riders off the map, we cannot say anything.

SO KONGOLS, why did they put the word SUPER in the title of the race, if it was not suppose to be supercross,
WHY DIDNT THEY JUST CALL IT "INDOOR MOTOCROSS"

Track sucked, event was a joke........and you know it.

Post a reply to: A disgrace to supercross

The Latest